APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 CLICK ARROW TO VIEW DRAFT
Page 2
Public Commenting on APrIGF Documents
Recent Comments on this Page
-
Winston Roberts
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.
-
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
-
Jac sm Kee
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
-
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
-
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
-
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
-
The background part looks good，especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
-
Izumi Aizu
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
nica
Recent Comments in this Document
-
I was pretty pleased to discover this page. I want to to thank
you for ones time just for this wonderful read!! I definitely appreciated every little bit of it and i also have you bookmarked
to look at new information on your website. -
Hello there I am so thrilled I found your webpage, I really found you by mistake, while I was researching on Google
for something else, Nonetheless I am here
now and would just like to say cheers for a remarkable post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also
love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the moment
but I have saved it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be
back to read much more, Please do keep up the excellent job. -
Thank you for helping out, wonderful information. “In case of dissension, never dare to judge till you’ve heard the other side.” by Euripides.
-
Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your weblog.
You have some really good posts and I think I would be a
good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some articles for your blog
in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested.
Regards! -
I believe everything posted was very reasonable.
However, what about this? suppose you composed a catchier title?
I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your website,
however suppose you added something that grabbed people’s attention? I mean General Comments | APrIGF Document Platform is a
little vanilla. You should glance at Yahoo’s front page and see how they create post headlines to get viewers to open the links.
You might add a video or a related picture or two to grab people
excited about what you’ve got to say. In my opinion, it might bring your
website a little livelier. -
WOW just what I was looking for. Came here by searching for
hatimanis88 -
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article.
I will be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info.
Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return. -
Thank you for the good writeup. It in reality was once a leisure account it. Glance advanced to far delivered agreeable from you! By the way, how can we keep up a correspondence?
-
What’s up Dear, are you genuinely visiting this web page daily,
if so then you will definitely obtain pleasant knowledge.
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
The background part looks good，especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.