APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 CLICK ARROW TO VIEW DRAFT
Page 2
Public Commenting on APrIGF Documents
Recent Comments on this Page
-
Winston Roberts
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.
-
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
-
Jac sm Kee
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
-
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
-
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
-
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
-
The background part looks good，especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
-
Izumi Aizu
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
nica
Recent Comments in this Document
-
Valuable info. Lucky me I found your web site by accident, and I am shocked why this accident did not happened earlier! I bookmarked it.
-
Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful information particularly the last part :) I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this particular information for a long time. Thank you and good luck.
-
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
-
I conceive this web site has some really wonderful information for everyone :D. “The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth.” by Edith Sitwell.
-
I got what you mean , thanks for posting.Woh I am pleased to find this website through google.
-
Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your website is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you have on this site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the info I already searched all over the place and just couldn’t come across. What a perfect web site.
-
The Pink Salt Trick is a minimalist but effective morning routine: Just drink a glass of lukewarm water mixed with a pinch of Himalayan pink salt as soon as you wake up.
-
I have recently started a web site, the info you offer on this web site has helped me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work.
-
The Pink Salt Trick is a minimalist but effective morning routine: Just drink a glass of lukewarm water mixed with a pinch of Himalayan pink salt as soon as you wake up.
-
I’m still learning from you, while I’m making my way to the top as well. I absolutely enjoy reading everything that is posted on your site.Keep the tips coming. I loved it!
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
The background part looks good，especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.