APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 CLICK ARROW TO VIEW DRAFT
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 APrIGF Macao 2015 Synthesis Document
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 CLICK ARROW TO VIEW DRAFT
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
The background part looks good,especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
As digital systems underpin identity, commerce, and governance, users face risks they can’t meaningfully assess or control. DCDR responds by making protection proactive and engineered into infrastructure—moving faster and more effectively than traditional legal or regulatory approaches.
DCDR makes rights executable by embedding them directly into system design and code. It ensures data use is strictly purpose-bound, minimal, and transparently enforced, while structured taxonomies of harms, rights, and controls enable automation, auditing, and interoperability across digital systems.DCDR is built on three guiding principles: I Am My Data, which treats an individual’s data as inseparable from the person; End Remedy, which focuses on preventing harms rather than compensating after they occur; and Rights By Design, which ensures that legal and ethical protections are encoded directly into technology so that compliance becomes automatic, transparent, and verifiable.
Recommendations
Treat internet as critical infrastructure in disaster planning and ensure continuity through backup systems and diverse providers.
Build digital capacity and literacy in vulnerable and remote communities to strengthen preparedness and local response.
Embed rights-based data governance—protect privacy, promote transparency, and design early warning systems that build public trust.
Recommendations
Treat internet as critical infrastructure in disaster planning and ensure continuity through backup systems and diverse providers.
Build digital capacity and literacy in vulnerable and remote communities to strengthen preparedness and local response.
Embed rights-based data governance—protect privacy, promote transparency, and design early warning systems that build public trust.
Key Takeaways
Connectivity is critical: Reliable internet access is as essential as electricity during disasters; outages or shutdowns severely hinder response and coordination.
Resilience needs redundancy: Decentralized networks, radio backups, and regional or satellite alternatives (like Starlink) are vital when physical infrastructure fails.
Equity and trust matter: Marginalized communities face the greatest risk; inclusive access, digital literacy, and data protection must underpin disaster response systems.
Tension between digital sovereignty (national/regional control) and global Internet interoperability is flagged as a key challenge.
Internet fragmentation is a rising challenge in view of domestic / national policies particularly data laocalization, content regulation etc., which poses long term threat to the region’s digital integration and digital sovereignty.
Regional approaches to data governance is a crucial subject, with a focus on balancing innovation with protection. However a rights based, locally adapted frameworks and investment in DPI is appreciated.
AprIGF is a great platform to discuss the need for inclusive dialogue and policy coherence to maintain a globally interoperable Internet. There is need to enhance cooperation within and between different stakeholders in Internet Governance space.
The Showcase session on “Experience of Co-designing Digital Justice and Inclusion Initiatives with Communities in Bangladesh” presented how Oxfam in Bangladesh and Monash University are partnering under PROTIC II to bridge digital divides among fisherfolk, domestic workers, and tea-garden communities. Speakers demonstrated how community-driven research and participatory co-design have produced inclusive tools such as PAROLI, Nodir Koushol, Jalshikkah, and PRAGATI, which strengthen digital literacy, enable peer learning, and amplify community voices for rights and livelihood improvement.
Audience engagement was lively, centering on the effectiveness of co-design models, sustainability of digital inclusion efforts, and ways policymakers can integrate community voices. The discussion reaffirmed that co-creation with communities is essential for long-term adoption and relevance. Sustainability, participants agreed, requires active involvement of government and policy actors from the start. The session concluded that inclusive, low-tech, and locally led digital initiatives can transform marginalized groups into informed digital citizens capable of influencing policy and social change.
Website content © APrIGF Document Platform 2025. All rights reserved.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| CookieLawInfoConsent | 1 year | Records the default button state of the corresponding category & the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie. |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| _ga | 2 years | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. |
| _gat_gtag_UA_1450632_51 | 1 minute | Set by Google to distinguish users. |
| _gid | 1 day | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
Source: https://comment.rigf.asia/title-page/
How about substituting the phrase:
“The Outcomes Document aims to document” with “The Outcomes Document aims to identify” to avoid duplication of using “document”.
The background part looks good,especially the 3rd paragraph.
What’s not clear to me is the purpose of this OD? What are we going to do with it? Who will be the audience or recipients? Are we going to “released” or “submit” OD to the other international arenas? How would be the relevance of OD to the future rIGF?
The 3rd paragraph shows the unbinding nature of the OD but it did not clarify the purpose.
As we are renaming the document from “Outcomes document” to something else. Would be good to keep it consistent. How about “APrIGF Synthesis Document”? More accurate?
+1 jac
or APrIGF Multistakeholder Synthesis (without the word “Document”)
Again, an update of the process would be needed:
– 1st rough draft based on workshop submissions
– 2nd iteration from comments through the online platform & public dissemination of the link etc (from dates)
– 3rd iteration from comments (platform) & (dates)
– Final version through rough consensus
Something like this? Or based on the secretariat’s excellent summation so far already in the mailing list
from participants at the APrIGF (as well as the broader APrIGF community through remote participation and dissemination at the mailing list)
instead of project, why not “express voices, views and thoughts…”
I agree that the APrIGF conference needs an outcomes document, to demonstrate that so much effort has been productive. This is important for the organisations which sponsor workshops and for the agencies which fund the participation of regional experts.